Frequency therapy

Frequency therapy

logo-for-web-titles green

Special frequency for microcurrent therapy (FSM)

In 1996, Carolyn McMakin began using frequencies for myofascial trigger points and myofascial pain. Finally, other frequencies obtained from the writings of Dr. Albert Abrams and the list of Dr. McWilliams were added to the list. Thus, “Frequency Specific Microcurrent” (FSM) therapy was born.After treating several patients and observing clinical effects for over a year, McMakin first taught the method in 1997. He did this with the goal of determining whether the results could be replicated. The question was whether this technique was really effective, or whether the results were obtained because of its effect on the patient’s mind or reaction, or because of something else in the clinical setting.A few months later, it became clear that his students had achieved similar results to McMakin’s, particularly in the treatment of myofascial pain from trigger points. In 1998, combinations of frequencies were used to successfully treat nerve pain, such as sciatica caused by disc damage. Only one frequency combination was effective in reducing nerve pain. In 1999, a combination of frequencies was discovered by McMakin to eliminate the physical pain associated with fibromyalgia caused by spinal cord injury.The frequencies used in FSM are electromagnetic pulses that are transmitted by a device in two separate channels simultaneously.The frequencies are distributed using an amplified square wave that contains high frequency harmonics. This process makes the frequencies more accurate than the pure frequencies produced by a sine wave generator. Most microcurrent devices use square wave pulses because they have been found to be more clinically effective. The basis of treatment is to increase ATP production, amino acid transport and protein synthesis.The frequency protocols used are frequency sequences that have a specific clinical effect observed in different pathological conditions. These protocols may be performed once in a treatment session or may be performed repeatedly until the patient recovers.In FSM treatment, two different frequencies are used simultaneously. The frequency believed to treat or neutralize the pathological condition is placed on one channel of the device, and the desired frequency is set on channel B to target the network. The frequencies used in FSM are all below 1000 Hz. In this list are frequencies that are said to treat more than 200 pathological conditions, from very common conditions such as inflammation, scar tissue, mineral deposits and toxicity to very unusual and difficult conditions such as poliovirus, trauma and congestion.Frequencies appear to have very satisfactory results in improving pain and function in many clinical conditions. FSM is especially effective in treating nerve and muscle pain, inflammation and scarring. There is a type of fibromyalgia associated with spinal cord injury that is very painful and difficult to treat even with medication. There is only one frequency combination that is used to eliminate pain in patients with this disease.Shingles responds very well to a combination of frequencies that relieves pain in 20 minutes and causes skin manifestations to resolve in about two to three days. There is a combination of frequencies that is 100% effective in eliminating renal colic. This frequency combination is not effective for removing kidney stones and only relieves pain. Other frequencies have beneficial effects on asthma, liver dysfunction (reducing elevated liver enzymes), irritable bowel syndrome, and many other conditions.It has been observed that in patients who were treated up to four hours after injury, such as those who had car accidents and surgery, the frequencies greatly reduced the pain and these patients went through the healing process quickly. There is no guarantee that a protocol will be effective on any given patient under any circumstances. In general, frequencies either work or they don’t, and if they don’t, they won’t have any effect.

Differences between FSM and Rife therapy

The main difference between Rife therapy and FSM is the level of frequencies used. All FSM frequencies are below 1000 Hz. Rife frequencies are clearly higher. The second difference is that in FSM, two frequency channels are used simultaneously, which emit two different frequencies.

Also, FSM never uses frequencies to treat cancer. There are frequencies that relieve chemotherapy-induced nausea, frequencies that reverse the effects of radiation in patients receiving radiation therapy, and frequencies that effectively treat scar tissue from radiation therapy. But McMahon has never been involved in cancer treatment. He has reasons for not using this method to treat cancer: “Number one is that I don’t want what happened to Rife to happen to me again.

This is the first one. But the second point is that cancer is a serious disease. If the use of a correctly selected frequency worsens the pain, the problem is not serious and only the pain is inflicted on the patient. But if we inadvertently do something through ignorance that accidentally worsens the cancer situation in the patient’s body, there is no way to help the person and improve his condition. Therefore, we do not cure cancer.”

Book title: Bioresonance the Truth
Author: loannis Anagnostopoulos
Translator: Dr. Mehtab Jahan Shahtalab

McMakin, C. (1998). Microcurrent treatment of myofascial pain in the head, neck and face. Topics in Clinical Chiropractic.

McMakin, C. (2004). Microcurrent therapy: a novel treatment method for chronic low back myofascial pain. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 8.

McMakin, C. (2017). The Resonance Effect: How Frequency Specific Microcurrent Is Changing Medicine. North Atlantic Books.

McMakin, C., Gregory, W., Philips, T. (2005). Cytokine changes with microcurrent treatment of fibromyalgia associated with cervical spine trauma. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 9.

Oschman, J. (2000). Energy Medicine, The Scientific Basis. Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh.
Waygood, C. (2018). How Do Microcurrents Work to Help in the Healing Process?

Curtis, D., Fallows, S., Morris, M., Mcmakin, C. (2011). The efficacy of frequency specific microcurrent therapy on delayed onset hamstring muscle soreness. British Journal of Sports Medicine – BRIT J SPORT MED. 45. 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081570.31.

Table of contents

دستگاه بیوفیلیا لوتوس

Biophilia Lotus NLS device

Biophilia Lotus device, which is one of the newest and most advanced bioresonance devices, is able to scan different organs of the body, diagnose and treat diseases.

دستگاه لوتوس NLS

Lotus NLS device

The advanced Lotus NLS device, as the newest bioresonance device, is capable of analyzing the frequency and vibrations of different organs at the level of cells and even chromosomes.

Related posts

PEMF
موج تا ماده

PEMF therapy

PEMF therapy Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) therapy uses electromagnetic fields to restore the body’s natural mechanism and promote cellular health. PEMF coils in these devices

Read more »
دسته بندی نشده
موج تا ماده

Bioresonance therapy

Bioresonance therapy The term “bioresonance therapy” (BRT) was coined in 1987 by Hans Brigman to describe treatment with the patient’s own oscillations. This form of

Read more »
دسته بندی نشده
موج تا ماده

extracellular matrix

extracellular matrix Multicellular organisms are made up of specialized cells that are organized into tissues. Individual cells are in contact with and interact with other

Read more »

درخواست مشاوره آنی

فرم مشاوره هوشمند ما با قابلیت تعیین زمان و نوع تماس میتواند برای رسیدن به نتیجه مطلوب به شما کمک کند، پس از تکمیل فرم توسط شما ، کارشناس مربوطه ، در زمان تعیین شده و از راه ارتباطی انتخاب شده با شما تماس خواهد گرفت.

Smart advice

Full Name(Required)
Full Name
Communication method
Phone Number
Contact date
YYYY slash MM slash DD
call time(Required)
call time
:
The subject of the consultation request

× guidance center